Is Guardvibe MCP server safe?
Probably. Read the findings first.
Use with care. Some checks failed or could not be verified.
What to know before installing
- highWhole environment serialized (possible credential exfil)
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-22 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
1 high2 medium
- Code scan213 source files scanned3/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 0 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner; GitHub account older than a year8/10
Findings (3)
- highWhole environment serialized (possible credential exfil)
env.dumpbuild/data/rules/ai-tool-runtime.js: …eturn { content: [{ type: "text", text: JSON.stringify(process.env) }] };', compliance: ["SOC2:CC6.… - mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truebuild/data/rules/core.js: …s.run([...]) with list arguments, never shell=True with user input.", fixCode: "//…
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalbuild/tools/cross-file-taint.js: …e-injection": "Never pass user input to eval() or Function constructor.", "co…
Overall 58/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Guardvibe does
- CodeInspectusLocal-first MCP security scanner and CLI for AI-generated applications.not reviewedGrowingC
- npm Registry MCP Servernpm registry MCP server — package intelligence, security audits, dependency analysisnot reviewedGrowingB
- SPARDAAI writes. SPARDA proves. Deterministic, offline security gate for AI edits.not reviewedGrowingA