Mmcp.market

Is CiteHawk MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B70/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-26 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

1 low
  • –Code scanremote-only server, no package to scann/a
  • Live reliabilityremote reachable in 315ms (auth required)20/20
  • –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (endpoint requires auth); not countedn/a
  • Auth qualityOAuth resource metadata advertised on 40115/15
  • Maintenanceno repository listed3/15
  • Maintainer identityverified namespace with website, no repo4/10

Findings (1)

  • lowNo source repository listedmaint.no-repo
Overall 70/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON

Other servers that do what CiteHawk does

  • GEO Tracker by DigestSEO
    Track brand citations across seven AI search surfaces. Free OSS; optional EUR 99 client-ready audit.
    B
  • Misakanet
    Failure-memory layer for coding agents: search evidence-rated failure lessons by error text.
    A
  • HasData Bing
    Bing search results with the ad block and Copilot answer, geo and market targeting, as JSON.
    A

CiteHawk reviews, tools and install