Is Bawbel Scanner MCP server safe?
Yes, with the usual care.
Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.
No critical or high findings in the latest scan.
Public scan report
scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it
2 medium
- Code scan56 source files scanned15/25
- –Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
- –Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
- Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
- Maintenancelast push 15 days ago15/15
- Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10
Findings (2)
- mediumsubprocess with shell=True
exec.shell-truebawbel_scanner-1.2.3/pyproject.toml: …# subprocess list args - correct, never shell=True ] severity = "medium" # ── Tool: flake…
- mediumeval / new Function used
exec.evalbawbel_scanner-1.2.3/scanner/engines/sandbox_engine.py: …, "AVE-2026-00004", "HIGH", 5.9), ("eval() code execution", "AVE-2026-00004", "HI…
Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.RubricAppeal a findingJSON
Other servers that do what Bawbel Scanner does
- CodeInspectusLocal-first MCP security scanner and CLI for AI-generated applications.not reviewedGrowingC
- Prodcheck4,372 pre-production checks: security, performance, scale, integrations, post-launch.not reviewedGrowingA
- prodlintProduction readiness for vibe-coded apps. 52 checks for security, reliability, and performance.not reviewedGrowingA