Is Bawbel Scanner MCP server safe?

Yes, with the usual care.

B75/100grade B

Safe to use. Minor gaps such as a missing repository or slower maintenance.

No critical or high findings in the latest scan.

Public scan report

scanner v0.1.9 · 2026-09-27 · same rubric, same numbers if you re-run it

2 medium

Code scan47 source files scanned15/25
–Live reliabilityno gateway calls yet and no remote to proben/a
–Tool poisoningtools not inspected (local package is not executed); not countedn/a
Auth qualitylocal package, no credentials required12/15
Maintenancelast push 16 days ago15/15
Maintainer identityregistry namespace matches repository owner7/10

mediumsubprocess with shell=Trueexec.shell-true

bawbel_scanner-1.1.1/pyproject.toml: …# subprocess list args — correct, never shell=True ] severity = "medium" # ── Tool: flake…

mediumeval / new Function usedexec.eval

bawbel_scanner-1.1.1/scanner/engines/sandbox_engine.py: …, "AVE-2026-00004", "HIGH", 8.8), ("eval() code execution", "AVE-2026-00004", "HI…

Overall 75/100. Components that don't apply are left out of the denominator. Any critical finding is an F.Rubric Appeal a finding JSON

CodeInspectus
Local-first MCP security scanner and CLI for AI-generated applications.
not reviewed
Growing
C
Prodcheck
4,372 pre-production checks: security, performance, scale, integrations, post-launch.
not reviewed
Growing
A
prodlint
Production readiness for vibe-coded apps. 52 checks for security, reliability, and performance.
not reviewed
Growing
A