Head to head
Trent vs npm Registry MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Security reviews, threat models over a repo or website, and remediation tracking, in your editor.
Full listing
No reviews yet
npm registry MCP server — package intelligence, security audits, dependency analysis
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trent (97/100 against 83). Trent is hosted and callable through the gateway; npm Registry MCP Server runs on your own machine.
| Trent | npm Registry MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 9 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 1.3k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 64 |
| Write actions | — | 10 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-03 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | Security | Security |