Head to head
ScanLabsAI Security Scanner vs Trent
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Scan a website for vulnerabilities: OWASP Top 10, CVEs, SSL, headers - with plain-English fixes
Full listing
No reviews yet
Security reviews, threat models over a repo or website, and remediation tracking, in your editor.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trent (97/100 against 70). Trent has noticeably more public adoption.
| ScanLabsAI Security Scanner | Trent | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 9 |
| Downloads / week | 96 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 8 | — |
| Write actions | 2 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-03 |
| Category | Security | Security |