Head to head
Arcstone Sidecar vs Trent
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Deterministic execution boundary and reference MCP sidecar for Arcstone Security Stack
Full listing
No reviews yet
Security reviews, threat models over a repo or website, and remediation tracking, in your editor.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trent (97/100 against 65). Trent is hosted and callable through the gateway; Arcstone Sidecar runs on your own machine. Trent has noticeably more public adoption.
| Arcstone Sidecar | Trent | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 9 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-03 |
| Category | Security | Security |