Mmcp.market

Head to head

Reversecore MCP vs arcstone-mcp-sidecar

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Reversecore MCPio.github.sjkim1127/reversecore-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Security-first MCP server for reverse engineering, malware analysis, forensics, and SAST.

Full listing
arcstone-mcp-sidecario.github.trencinodin-stack/arcstone-mcp-sidecar
C
No reviews yet

Deterministic execution boundary and reference MCP sidecar for Arcstone Security Stack

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Reversecore MCP (77/100 against 65). Reversecore MCP has noticeably more public adoption.

 Reversecore MCParcstone-mcp-sidecar
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB77/100C65/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars2030
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-192026-09-18
CategorySecuritySecurity

Other comparisons

Reversecore MCP vs MCPProxyReversecore MCP vs dns-doctorReversecore MCP vs secobserve-mcpReversecore MCP vs DraugrReversecore MCP vs VulnCheckAll Security servers