Head to head
Obsidian Turbocharged vs Context7
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Obsidian Turbocharged
Cio.github.The-40-Thieves/obsidian-tcNo reviews yet
Model-agnostic, agent-ready Obsidian MCP server with RBAC, SLSA provenance, and native search.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Context7 (90/100 against 65). Context7 is hosted and callable through the gateway; Obsidian Turbocharged runs on your own machine. Context7 has noticeably more public adoption.
| Obsidian Turbocharged | Context7 | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A90/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 5 | 62k |
| Downloads / week | 757 | 618k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |