Head to head
Workfile vs Obsidian Turbocharged
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Repository-native protocol and local MCP server for Work, Docs, History and durable project Memory.
Full listingObsidian Turbocharged
Bio.github.The-40-Thieves/obsidian-tcNo reviews yet
Model-agnostic, agent-ready Obsidian MCP server with RBAC, SLSA provenance, and native search.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Workfile (92/100 against 83).
| Workfile | Obsidian Turbocharged | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 5 |
| Downloads / week | 663 | 694 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 32 | 3 |
| Write actions | 10 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |