Head to head
mcp-airlock vs World Monitor
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mcp-airlock
Bio.github.Shalimov04/mcp-airlockNo reviews yet
Governance proxy for MCP servers: allowlist, forced dry run, human confirmation, blast radius, audit
Full listing
No reviews yet
Live markets, conflicts, country risk, chokepoints, energy, and China decision signals. 75 tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours World Monitor (95/100 against 75). World Monitor is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-airlock runs on your own machine. World Monitor has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcp-airlock | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A95/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | 25 | 87k |
| Downloads / week | 278 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |