Head to head
mcp-airlock vs Microsoft 365 MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mcp-airlock
Bio.github.Shalimov04/mcp-airlockNo reviews yet
Governance proxy for MCP servers: allowlist, forced dry run, human confirmation, blast radius, audit
Full listing
No reviews yet
Interact with Microsoft 365 and Office services through the Microsoft Graph API.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (75 and 75 out of 100). Microsoft 365 MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcp-airlock | Microsoft 365 MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 25 | 983 |
| Downloads / week | 278 | 41k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |