Head to head
Redash vs StackQL MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Connect Redash to Claude -- query data, manage dashboards, and run SQL with natural language.
Full listing
No reviews yet
SQL-native query and provisioning engine for cloud infrastructure, served over MCP.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours StackQL MCP Server (90/100 against 75). StackQL MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Redash | StackQL MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | A90/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 991 |
| Downloads / week | 383 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 24 | — |
| Write actions | 7 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-01 | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |