Head to head
Greptimedb vs Redash
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Query GreptimeDB metrics, logs and traces with SQL, TQL and RANGE. Manage pipelines and dashboards.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Connect Redash to Claude -- query data, manage dashboards, and run SQL with natural language.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Greptimedb (85/100 against 75).
| Greptimedb | Redash | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 29 | 1 |
| Downloads / week | – | 383 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 24 |
| Write actions | — | 7 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-01 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |