Head to head
mcp vs inbox-to-action
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Email infrastructure for AI agents: send, read replies as threads, campaigns, per-key limits.
Full listinginbox-to-action
?io.github.tarunlnmiit/inbox-to-actionNo reviews yet
Agentic Gmail triage: classify, summarize, extract tasks, draft replies. Never sends.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. mcp is hosted and callable through the gateway; inbox-to-action runs on your own machine. mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcp | inbox-to-action | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B84/100 | ? |
| Adoption | Growing | — |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 581 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 55 | — |
| Write actions | 23 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | — |
| Category |