Head to head
mailwarden vs mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mailwarden
Aio.github.csitte/mailwardenNo reviews yet
Gmail MCP server for email triage: search, labels, archive, trash, unsubscribe, snooze.
Full listingmcp
Bai.sendraven/mcpNo reviews yet
Email infrastructure for AI agents: send, read replies as threads, campaigns, per-key limits.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mailwarden (94/100 against 84). mcp is hosted and callable through the gateway; mailwarden runs on your own machine.
| mailwarden | mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A94/100 | B84/100 |
| Adoption | — | — |
| GitHub stars | – | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 55 |
| Write actions | — | 23 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | — |
| Last release | — | — |
| Category |