Head to head
Filamental vs MCPProxy
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Filamental
Aio.github.Scottnine/filamentalNo reviews yet
Read/write access to your Filamental knowledge graph vault. 17 tools. Local-first, no auth.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Local-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savings
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Filamental (85/100 against 73). MCPProxy has noticeably more public adoption.
| Filamental | MCPProxy | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 377 |
| Downloads / week | 53 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 17 | — |
| Write actions | 5 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |