Head to head
Filamental vs Reversecore MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Filamental
Aio.github.Scottnine/filamentalNo reviews yet
Read/write access to your Filamental knowledge graph vault. 17 tools. Local-first, no auth.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Security-first MCP server for reverse engineering, malware analysis, forensics, and SAST.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Filamental (85/100 against 77). Reversecore MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Filamental | Reversecore MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 2 | 203 |
| Downloads / week | 53 | 128 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 17 | 44 |
| Write actions | 5 | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |