Head to head
Protect vs VERAX
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Fail-closed Cedar policy gate + Ed25519 signed receipts for agent tool calls. Denies on any error.
Full listing
No reviews yet
The body an agent asks before it acts: decide, approve, and keep a signed record on your machine.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours VERAX (91/100 against 65).
| Protect | VERAX | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 9 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 1.6k | 255 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 12 | 6 |
| Write actions | 5 | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |