Head to head
Ausca vs Protect
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Pay-per-call APIs and MCP services for agents, no accounts or keys, with verifiable receipts.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Fail-closed Cedar policy gate + Ed25519 signed receipts for agent tool calls. Denies on any error.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Ausca (84/100 against 65). Ausca is hosted and callable through the gateway; Protect runs on your own machine.
| Ausca | Protect | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B84/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 15 | 9 |
| Downloads / week | 220 | 1.6k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 14 | 12 |
| Write actions | 2 | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-17 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |