Head to head
Protect vs Acronis MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Fail-closed Cedar policy gate + Ed25519 signed receipts for agent tool calls. Denies on any error.
Full listing
No reviews yet
The first real CLI for the Acronis Cyber Protect Cloud platform - every tenant, agent, and usage
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Acronis MCP (75/100 against 57).
| Protect | Acronis MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 9 | 41 |
| Downloads / week | 1.6k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 12 | — |
| Write actions | 5 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |