Head to head
Trading Signals vs RunOnProof — Payment Decision and Agent ID
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Live AI crypto trading signals for agents. No API key needed to try — 3 signals + hit rate.
Full listingRunOnProof — Payment Decision and Agent ID
Cio.github.runonproof/cdoNo reviews yet
Free agent identity and signed US supplier-payment decisions. Inspect first; verify portable proof.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trading Signals (81/100 against 57). Trading Signals has noticeably more public adoption.
| Trading Signals | RunOnProof — Payment Decision and Agent ID | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B81/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 115 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | 16 |
| Write actions | 1 | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | — |
| Category | Finance | Finance |