Head to head
RiskState — Crypto Risk Engine vs Trading Signals
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Live BTC/ETH risk state: risk policy, market structure and trading playbooks. Keyless free tier.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Live AI crypto trading signals for agents. No API key needed to try — 3 signals + hit rate.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours RiskState — Crypto Risk Engine (92/100 against 81). Trading Signals has noticeably more public adoption.
| RiskState — Crypto Risk Engine | Trading Signals | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B81/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 115 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | 5 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | Finance | Finance |
Other comparisons
RiskState — Crypto Risk Engine vs CoinRithm Agent TradingRiskState — Crypto Risk Engine vs AlphaBotPro Trading APIRiskState — Crypto Risk Engine vs TradingCalc MCP: Crypto Trading, On-Chain & Prediction MarketsRiskState — Crypto Risk Engine vs BlockrunRiskState — Crypto Risk Engine vs AlgoVault — Crypto Quant Trade CallsAll Finance servers