Head to head
Pa1m Hyperliquid vs MCP Server
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Hyperliquid DEX data: prices, order books, candles, funding rates, portfolios. Pay-per-call, x402.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Phone numbers for AI agents: order a private number, read the SMS verification code, hand it back.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Server (75/100 against 58). Pa1m Hyperliquid is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Server runs on your own machine. MCP Server has noticeably more public adoption.
| Pa1m Hyperliquid | MCP Server | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C58/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 552 |
| Downloads / week | – | 26 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 9 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-08-10 |
| Category | E-commerce | E-commerce |