Mmcp.market

Head to head

Tiny vs Pa1m Hyperliquid

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Tinyio.github.codespar/mcp-tiny
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for Tiny ERP — products, stock, warehouses, price lists, orders, invoices, AP/AR

Full listing
Pa1m Hyperliquidio.github.retampweb/pa1m-hyperliquid
C
No reviews yet

Hyperliquid DEX data: prices, order books, candles, funding rates, portfolios. Pay-per-call, x402.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tiny (82/100 against 58). Pa1m Hyperliquid is hosted and callable through the gateway; Tiny runs on your own machine. Tiny has noticeably more public adoption.

 TinyPa1m Hyperliquid
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB82/100C58/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars271–
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools21—
Write actions5—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT—
Last release2026-08-29—
CategoryE-commerceE-commerce

Other comparisons