Head to head
Raven vs Auditreach
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Design intelligence for coding agents: audits, design systems, and a taste profile agents consult.
Full listing
No reviews yet
BYOK Reddit/YouTube research CLI with a tamper-evident audit log and an MCP server.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Auditreach (92/100 against 82). Raven is hosted and callable through the gateway; Auditreach runs on your own machine. Raven has noticeably more public adoption.
| Raven | Auditreach | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B82/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 6 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 129 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-08-24 | 2026-09-11 |
| Category | Media | Media |