Head to head
Agentic Design System vs Raven
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Render web and SwiftUI evidence, run explicit visual judgment, and trace ADS UI decisions.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Design intelligence for coding agents: audits, design systems, and a taste profile agents consult.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Agentic Design System (92/100 against 82). Raven is hosted and callable through the gateway; Agentic Design System runs on your own machine.
| Agentic Design System | Raven | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 5 | 6 |
| Downloads / week | 39 | 129 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-08-24 |
| Category | Media | Media |