Mmcp.market

Head to head

Context Vault vs Per Diem

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Context Vaultio.github.RajdeepDas43/context-vault
C
No reviews yet

Governed memory for AI agents (Paramind AI): conflict-checked writes, time-travel reads, ACL, audit.

Full listing
Per Diemio.github.theluckystrike/per-diem
A
No reviews yet

Daily travel allowances from bundled public rate tables: Poland, HMRC and GSA CONUS.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Per Diem (88/100 against 57). Per Diem is hosted and callable through the gateway; Context Vault runs on your own machine. Per Diem has noticeably more public adoption.

 Context VaultPer Diem
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC57/100A88/100
Adoption—Growing
GitHub stars–0
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools79
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release—2026-09-19
CategoryMaps and travelMaps and travel

Other comparisons

Context Vault vs AttestariContext Vault vs ReasonGraph Cloud memoryContext Vault vs ArgonContext Vault vs MaxAEO AI Visibility MCPContext Vault vs travel.artAll Maps and travel servers