Head to head
Attestari vs Context Vault
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Attestari
Bio.github.attestari/attestariNo reviews yet
Auditable memory for AI agents: provable deletion, tamper-evident audit, time-travel recall.
Full listingContext Vault
Cio.github.RajdeepDas43/context-vaultNo reviews yet
Governed memory for AI agents (Paramind AI): conflict-checked writes, time-travel reads, ACL, audit.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Attestari (77/100 against 57). Attestari has noticeably more public adoption.
| Attestari | Context Vault | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B77/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | New | — |
| GitHub stars | 0 | – |
| Downloads / week | 39 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 4 | 7 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-12 | — |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |