Head to head
Stealthy Auto Browse vs Render
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Self-hosted MCP server for stealth browser automation with human-like OS-level input.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Hosted browser for AI agents: screenshots, post-JS DOM, console, WCAG. No install, no API key.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Stealthy Auto Browse (88/100 against 79). Render is hosted and callable through the gateway; Stealthy Auto Browse runs on your own machine.
| Stealthy Auto Browse | Render | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | B79/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 81 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | WTFPL | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-13 | 2026-09-03 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |