Head to head
Gateway vs Stealthy Auto Browse
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Durable self for AI agents: one-call resume, memory, real browser, free chat + hire real humans.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Self-hosted MCP server for stealth browser automation with human-like OS-level input.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Stealthy Auto Browse (88/100 against 77). Gateway is hosted and callable through the gateway; Stealthy Auto Browse runs on your own machine.
| Gateway | Stealthy Auto Browse | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B77/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 81 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 57 | — |
| Write actions | 10 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | WTFPL |
| Last release | 2026-09-15 | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |