Head to head
Magic Cloud vs data
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Generate secured CRUD APIs over your database, run SQL, manage files, tasks and a headless browser
Full listing
No reviews yet
PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQL Server in one session. 26 read-only MCP tools for AI agents.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Magic Cloud (88/100 against 70). data is hosted and callable through the gateway; Magic Cloud runs on your own machine. Magic Cloud has noticeably more public adoption.
| Magic Cloud | data | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 1.2k | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | Databases | Databases |