Head to head
Neon vs Magic Cloud
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Official Neon MCP server for managing Neon projects and Lakebase Postgres databases.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Generate secured CRUD APIs over your database, run SQL, manage files, tasks and a headless browser
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Neon (97/100 against 88). Neon is hosted and callable through the gateway; Magic Cloud runs on your own machine.
| Neon | Magic Cloud | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A97/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 648 | 1.2k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |