Mmcp.market

Head to head

Hyperbrowser vs mcp-local-rag

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Hyperbrowserio.github.pipeworx-io/hyperbrowser
B
No reviews yet

Hyperbrowser MCP — wraps the Hyperbrowser AI-agent browsing API

Full listing
mcp-local-ragio.github.shinpr/mcp-local-rag
A
No reviews yet

Easy-to-setup local RAG server with minimal configuration

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-local-rag (92/100 against 77). Hyperbrowser is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-local-rag runs on your own machine. mcp-local-rag has noticeably more public adoption.

 Hyperbrowsermcp-local-rag
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB77/100A92/100
AdoptionGrowingEstablished
GitHub stars0399
Downloads / week–4.7k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools39—
Write actions4—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-18
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Hyperbrowser vs ha-mcpHyperbrowser vs IWEHyperbrowser vs fiori-mcp-serverHyperbrowser vs mcp-ts-coreHyperbrowser vs mockserverAll AI and agents servers