Head to head
ha-mcp vs Hyperbrowser
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for managing Home Assistant through AI assistants.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Hyperbrowser (77/100 against 55). Hyperbrowser is hosted and callable through the gateway; ha-mcp runs on your own machine. ha-mcp has noticeably more public adoption.
| ha-mcp | Hyperbrowser | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 4.8k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 67k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 39 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |