Head to head
TerraVision vs jira-mini-mcp
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Cloud architecture diagrams generated from terraform plan, with official AWS, Azure, GCP icons
Full listingNo reviews yet
Minimal Jira Cloud MCP server: broad reads, a narrow 3-tool write surface, optional read-only mode.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (85 and 83 out of 100). TerraVision has noticeably more public adoption.
| TerraVision | jira-mini-mcp | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1.6k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 743 | 439 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |