Head to head
TerraVision vs ZopDev MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Cloud architecture diagrams generated from terraform plan, with official AWS, Azure, GCP icons
Full listingNo reviews yet
Cloud cost, inventory and governance on AWS/Azure/GCP. Read-only by default, optional scoped writes
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours ZopDev MCP (97/100 against 85). ZopDev MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; TerraVision runs on your own machine. TerraVision has noticeably more public adoption.
| TerraVision | ZopDev MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A85/100 | A97/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 1.6k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 743 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |