Mmcp.market

Head to head

FireKey MCP vs Scrapeless

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

FireKey MCPio.github.partnerhbhl/firekey-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Manage FireKey browser profiles and browser lifecycles through an authenticated localhost API.

Full listing
Scrapelessio.github.scrapeless-ai/scrapeless-mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

Web search, browser automation, scraping, crawling and CAPTCHA solving for AI agents.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Scrapeless (92/100 against 55). Scrapeless is hosted and callable through the gateway; FireKey MCP runs on your own machine. Scrapeless has noticeably more public adoption.

 FireKey MCPScrapeless
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC55/100A92/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–169
Downloads / week37244
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release—2026-09-08
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

FireKey MCP vs Public BrowserFireKey MCP vs SeleniumBase MCPFireKey MCP vs AIHawkFireKey MCP vs Ui.Vision MCPFireKey MCP vs SafariAll Scraping and browsing servers