Mmcp.market

Head to head

AIHawk vs FireKey MCP

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

AIHawkio.github.feder-cr/aihawk
A
No reviews yet

AI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.

Full listing
FireKey MCPio.github.partnerhbhl/firekey-mcp
C
No reviews yet

Manage FireKey browser profiles and browser lifecycles through an authenticated localhost API.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours AIHawk (92/100 against 55). AIHawk has noticeably more public adoption.

 AIHawkFireKey MCP
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100C55/100
AdoptionWidely usedNew
GitHub stars32k–
Downloads / week6.0k37
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools16—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-18—
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

AIHawk vs Oya BrowserAIHawk vs Aginx BrowserAIHawk vs Web ScraperAIHawk vs SeleniumBase MCPAIHawk vs ScrapelessAll Scraping and browsing servers