Head to head
no_human vs Snap Router
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
File a task with your local no_human and check on it: task_add and task_status over stdio.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (75 and 80 out of 100). no_human has noticeably more public adoption.
| no_human | Snap Router | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 317 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 330 | 18 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 2 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-04 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |