Head to head
loci vs no_human
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Cross-session memory and hybrid RAG over your notes and docs. Local-first, with cited answers.
Full listingNo reviews yet
File a task with your local no_human and check on it: task_add and task_status over stdio.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours loci (92/100 against 75).
| loci | no_human | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B75/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 95 | 317 |
| Downloads / week | 201 | 330 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |