Head to head
no_human vs Doppel
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
File a task with your local no_human and check on it: task_add and task_status over stdio.
Full listingDoppel
Cio.github.Samrj12/doppelNo reviews yet
Drive your real, logged-in Chrome/Edge from AI agents over CDP. Faster. Sharper.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours no_human (75/100 against 65). no_human has noticeably more public adoption.
| no_human | Doppel | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B75/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 317 | – |
| Downloads / week | 330 | 28 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 2 | 20 |
| Write actions | 1 | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |