Mmcp.market

Head to head

three.ws Provenance vs Shimguard

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

three.ws Provenanceio.github.nirholas/provenance-mcp
B
No reviews yet

Append-only, signed, on-chain-verifiable agent action log — record and audit what agents did.

Full listing
Shimguardio.github.RudrenduPaul/shimguard
A
No reviews yet

Wraps the ShimGuard CLI as a single generic MCP tool for agent-shim provenance checks.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Shimguard (92/100 against 83). three.ws Provenance has noticeably more public adoption.

 three.ws ProvenanceShimguard
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100A92/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars2060
Downloads / week29–
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—1
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-222026-09-13
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

three.ws Provenance vs Emilia Protocolthree.ws Provenance vs MCPthree.ws Provenance vs Agent-Native Chatthree.ws Provenance vs Mockserverthree.ws Provenance vs CHAP CoordinatorAll AI and agents servers