Head to head
MCP vs three.ws Provenance
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Append-only, signed, on-chain-verifiable agent action log — record and audit what agents did.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP (99/100 against 83). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; three.ws Provenance runs on your own machine.
| MCP | three.ws Provenance | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A99/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 533 | 206 |
| Downloads / week | 297 | 29 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |