Head to head
three.ws Provenance vs Reins
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Append-only, signed, on-chain-verifiable agent action log — record and audit what agents did.
Full listingReins
Cio.github.R2Rlabs/reinsNo reviews yet
Risk limits and an audit log for AI agents trading Hyperliquid, enforced outside the model.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours three.ws Provenance (83/100 against 55). three.ws Provenance has noticeably more public adoption.
| three.ws Provenance | Reins | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C55/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 206 | – |
| Downloads / week | 29 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | 9 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |