Head to head
three.ws Autopilot vs PRIMAMCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Set autopilot scopes and a daily SOL spend cap, then propose, execute, and undo agent actions.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Verified, citable German & EU law for any LLM. Daily updates from official sources, hosted in DE.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PRIMAMCP (99/100 against 83). PRIMAMCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; three.ws Autopilot runs on your own machine.
| three.ws Autopilot | PRIMAMCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A99/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 206 | 11 |
| Downloads / week | 28 | 33 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | 2026-09-09 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |