Head to head
Emilia Protocol vs three.ws Autopilot
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Exact-action approval for consequential agent actions: request, track, and verify signed receipts.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Set autopilot scopes and a daily SOL spend cap, then propose, execute, and undo agent actions.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours three.ws Autopilot (83/100 against 74).
| Emilia Protocol | three.ws Autopilot | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B74/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Established |
| GitHub stars | 617 | 206 |
| Downloads / week | 75 | 28 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 36 | — |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-21 | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |