Head to head
three.ws Agent Payments vs Site Rep MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Governed x402 payment sessions: pay any endpoint with budget, allowlist & per-tx caps, no key.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Read-only Site Rep handoff: agent brief, pending work, first-customer receipt with payment evidence.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours three.ws Agent Payments (83/100 against 57). Site Rep MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; three.ws Agent Payments runs on your own machine. three.ws Agent Payments has noticeably more public adoption.
| three.ws Agent Payments | Site Rep MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C57/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 206 | – |
| Downloads / week | 40 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-22 | — |
| Category | Finance | Finance |