Head to head
Peer Research Papers MCP vs Tinysearch
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Tinysearch (82/100 against 70). Peer Research Papers MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Tinysearch runs on your own machine. Tinysearch has noticeably more public adoption.
| Peer Research Papers MCP | Tinysearch | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | B82/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 229 |
| Downloads / week | – | 84 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-20 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |