Head to head
GEO Tracker by DigestSEO vs Peer Research Papers MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Track brand citations across five AI search engines. Free OSS; optional EUR 99 client-ready audit.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours GEO Tracker by DigestSEO (83/100 against 70). Peer Research Papers MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; GEO Tracker by DigestSEO runs on your own machine. GEO Tracker by DigestSEO has noticeably more public adoption.
| GEO Tracker by DigestSEO | Peer Research Papers MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 45 | – |
| Downloads / week | 279 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |